The latest research study “Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container Market: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2023-2028“.The global flexible intermediate bulk container market size reached US$ 5.2 Billion in 2022. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 7.1 Billion by 2028, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 5.1% during 2023-2028.
Global Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container Industry Definition and Application:
Four-panel, circular, u-panel, and baffle bags are some of the commonly used FIBCs. These bags are lightweight, environment friendly, and recyclable and can be easily transported with the assistance of a pallet jack or forklift. FIBCs are widely used to contain toxic, free-flowing and non-toxic products, such as petrochemicals, rubber, agriculture, and chemical products. As a result, FIBCs find extensive applications across the transportation, mining, manufacturing, agriculture and waste-handling industries.
Download free sample of the report: https://www.imarcgroup.com/flexible-intermediate-bulk-container-market/requestsample
Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container Market Trends:
Significant growth in the agriculture industry across the globe is creating a positive outlook for the market. In line with this, FIBCsare widely adopted to handle grains, rice, potatoes, cereals, sand, and liquid chemicals, thus supporting the market growth. Additionally, the widespread product adoption in the pharmaceutical industry for storing various medical products while preventing contamination is favoring the market growth. Apart from this, the introduction of electronic tagging of FICB that assists in providing relevant information regarding the reusability, safety, and traceability of the item and helps reduce loss and damage of products are providing an impetus to the market growth.
Moreover, the rising environmental consciousness among the masses has facilitated the demand for biodegradable and lightweight bulk packaging solutions, such as FICB, for various industrial applications, which, in turn, is augmenting the market growth. Besides this, various product innovations, such as the employment of virgin polypropylene resins as a key raw material due to an enhanced focus on hygiene,are positively impacting the market growth. Other factors, including the increasing product utilization to transport construction materials and the rising need to reduce the overall weight of bulk packaging, are anticipated to drive the market toward growth. On account of the aforementioned factors, the market is anticipated to reach a value of US$ 7.1 Billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 5.1% during 2023-2028.
Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container Market Segmentation:
The report has segmented the market on the basis on region, product and end use industry.
Breakup by Product:
- Type A
- Type B
- Type C
- Type D
Breakup by End-Use Industry:
- Food
- Chemicals
- Pharmaceuticals
- Others
Breakup by Region:
- North America:( United States, Canada)
- Asia-Pacific: (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, Others)
- Europe: (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, Others)
- Latin America: (Brazil, Mexico,Others)
- Middle East and Africa
Who are the Major Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container Market Key players?
- Bag Corp.
- Berry Global Inc.
- Bulk Lift International LLC
- Global-Pak Inc.
- Greif Inc.
- Isbir Sentetik Dokuma Sanayi A.S.
- Langston Companies Inc.
- LC Packaging International BV
- Plastipak Group
- Rishi FIBC Solutions PVT. Ltd.
Ask Analyst for Customization and Explore Full Report with TOC & List of Figure: https://www.imarcgroup.com/flexible-intermediate-bulk-container-market
If you need specific information that is not currently within the scope of the report, we will provide it to you as a part of the customization.
About Us
IMARC Group is a leading market research company that offers management strategy and market research worldwide. We partner with clients in all sectors and regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their businesses.
IMARC’s information products include major market, scientific, economic, and technological developments for business leaders in pharmaceutical, industrial, and high-technology organizations. Market forecasts and industry analysis for biotechnology, advanced materials, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, travel and tourism, nanotechnology, and novel processing methods are at the top of the company’s expertise.
Contact Us:
IMARC Group
Email: sales@imarcgroup.com
USA: +1-631-791-1145 | Asia: +91-120-433-0800
Address: 134 N 4th St. Brooklyn, NY 11249, USA
Website: https://www.imarcgroup.com
Follow us on Twitter: @imarcglobal
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/imarc-group
Absorption Costing MCQs with Answers Explanation Engineering ECE
What Is Absorption Costing?
Absorption costing, also known as the all-encompassing, all-inclusive, or comprehensive costing method, is a sophisticated and perplexing managerial accounting framework that attempts to incorporate all expenses that are linked to the production of a particular product. This method is highly intricate and involves a copious amount of calculations and analyses to arrive at the total cost of production.
Every minuscule expense, whether direct or indirect, such as raw materials, labor, rent, utilities, depreciation, maintenance, insurance, and every other associated cost, is taken into account to determine the total cost of the product. The complexity of this method is staggering, and it requires extensive knowledge of accounting principles, an understanding of manufacturing processes, and advanced analytical skills to execute.
However, despite its complexity, absorption costing is still widely used in the industry due to its comprehensive approach to providing an accurate picture of the cost of production. Moreover, under the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, absorption costing is an approved method for external reporting. In contrast, variable costing is prohibited, adding to the confusion and perplexity surrounding this topic.
Which of the following costs would NOT be included in the cost of goods sold calculation under absorption costing?
a) Direct materials
b) Direct labor
c) Variable manufacturing overhead
d) Fixed manufacturing overhead
Answer: c) Variable manufacturing overhead
Explanation: Under absorption costing, both fixed and variable manufacturing overhead costs are included in the cost of goods sold calculation. Direct materials and direct labor costs are also included.
When production exceeds sales, absorption costing will result in:
a) Higher net income than variable costing
b) Lower net income than variable costing
c) The same net income as variable costing
d) None of the above
Answer: a) Higher net income than variable costing
Explanation: When production exceeds sales, there will be more fixed manufacturing overhead costs that are absorbed into the cost of goods sold calculation under absorption costing. This results in a higher net income compared to variable costing, which only includes variable manufacturing costs in the cost of goods sold calculation.
Which of the following statements is true about absorption costing?
a) It is used for external reporting purposes
b) It is used for internal decision-making purposes
c) It is the same as variable costing
d) None of the above
Answer: a) It is used for external reporting purposes
Explanation: Absorption costing is required for external financial reporting purposes, such as on the income statement and in financial statements. Variable costing, on the other hand, is often used for internal decision-making purposes.
In a period of increasing production and sales, absorption costing will result in:
a) Higher net income than variable costing
b) Lower net income than variable costing
c) The same net income as variable costing
d) None of the above
Answer: c) The same net income as variable costing
Explanation: When production and sales increase, absorption costing and variable costing will result in the same net income. This is because there will be fewer fixed manufacturing overhead costs per unit under absorption costing, but there will also be more units sold.
